Sunday, March 29, 2015

Female Power in A Project Chick

A Project Chick paints a new definition of femininity and womanhood as the women of the novel navigate and survive the systems of oppression that they are living within. Tressa is described as the perfect woman and mother, who is doing everything she can to stay afloat after leaving her abusive boyfriend. The novel states that she “was very meek, humble and the definition of a lady. But don’t get it twisted, because her spunk and feistiness would make one think she had the heart of a lion” (150). Thus, we see a new definition of womanhood emerging as Tressa must develop strength to navigate the class, race, and gender discrimination that she faces.
More women in the novel are presented as strong and independent with a strong sense of self. Tressa’s hair stylist Gypsy believed and “lived by her motto, “Pussy is Power”, and as long as she had a well and clean coochie between her legs, there laid the power” (157). Despite this strong picture of the women in the novel, they still rely on men for financial help. For Gypsy, the novel also foregrounds the fact that “the guys she dated would pay her double, sometimes triple the money she made, so her hobby, her hustle, to do hair became second to her seeing her male friends” (159) and furthermore, “she saw opportunity and purposely got pregnant” (160). Gypsy strategically uses the men in her life to support her and her family financially.
The novel constantly draws attention to the precarious position of women’s finances, in that they are extremely strong and independent while still dependent on men to live a more comfortable life. We see this after Tressa leaves Lucky, “Tressa’s life had changed tremendously in the past few months since she had left Lucky. A dollar didn’t come easy” and “there were so many sacrifices she had to make” (154). Tressa also recognizes some of the various systemic obstacles and oppressions that face her when she says that it “seems like you have to commit some fraud just to stay afloat” (181). Again we see this reworking of womanhood for survival with Tressa’s relationship with Bill. She recognizes the mutual benefits of their relationship when she says that she “didn’t feel like a prostitute at all, she was getting paid for her services and doing what she had to do” (217) and “Tressa was definitely grateful because that money came in handy” (230) and it “enabled her to get ahead a little” (236). Thus, relationships with men become devices to help the women live a more stable life.
Within this dynamic, the novel also foregrounds class politics in which people reject low class status through consumption and material goods. Thus, although Tressa is in need for financial support, she rejects outright asking for help. The novel states that, “Tressa reflected that she didn’t want to put herself in the situation of making Jacko think, for one minute, that she needed him” and she “didn’t want to feel ‘needy’” (207). We see the motivations behind this throughout the novel, because “she didn’t want anybody feeling sorry for her or looking down on her” (183). Overall, the women in this novel have a lot of strength and agency despite their oppressions. Although they navigate this system and build their own lives, they are still very dependent on men for financial support. However, in my opinion, this is still a very strong representation of women because Nikki Turner emphasizes the fact that it is their choice to use the men and they also continually reject outright victimization, which, similar to Jacobs’s choices in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, grant the women more agency and power over their lives and bodies.








5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a really insightful post. I like your take on women's relationships with men in this novel. Your overarching point seems to be that each woman "strategically uses the men in her life to support her and her family financially" and "emphasizes the fact that it is [her] choice to use the men and [] continually reject outright victimization" I think this is quite correct because on one hand it appears that these women, especially Tressa, are indebted to their men due to the mistreatment they are willing to endure. However, on the other hand, Tressa is not a victim by any means; she is willing to ignore Lucky's major flaws just so she can keep her posh way of living. And when she doesn't want that way of life anymore, she leaves. She is not pathetic, naive, or weak. She is, as you say, being "strategic." Even when Tressa leaves Lucky and her finances become her main focal point once again, she uses her finances to get ahead as she tries to achieve a stable life. She doesn't feel like a prostitute because she is working through her situation and using her finances to meet her desires, which results in a sense of empowerment. One has to examine the "undertell" or the motive in these women's actions in order to see how much agency they really have and I think you make that point clear in this post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed reading your analysis of the novel, especially the way you phrased how Tressa acts in the novel as “navigating and surviving the systems of oppression” she lives within. I think that this is a perfect way to describe Tressa’s role in the novel as both an agent and as a survivor. You pointed out how the novel explicitly provides social commentary on the ways in which race, class, and gender operate when you said the narrator states, ““seems like you have to commit fraud to stay afloat.” I found this to be an extremely important point in the novel. The government help Tressa receives isn’t nearly enough money for her family to survive on. Child support is not a viable option given the abusive relationship Tressa was attempting to get out of. And the way the caseworkers treated her was deplorable. The novel heavily points out the larger systematic problems with the welfare system, child support, government aid, etc. I thought this was a great strength of the novel to fully and openly address those intense systematic issues. And showing Tressa’s navigation of those systems brings the novel into a personal realm. This made her situation specific and also more impactful.

    ReplyDelete
  4. THIS COMMENT IS FROM OCTAVIA: I agree with your analysis and it is the classic example of using the system to beat the system. This is a good way to look at feminism through a lense that is unlike the classic feminism where it rejects including or depending on men of some sort. The women in A Project Chick use the resources and strategies that they have available to create agency for themselves in an environement where they are subject to racial and gender oppression and poverty. I like that you acknowledge their strength, and recognize that characters like Gypsy and Tressa finds a sort of empowerment in using their bodies to provide for themselves and their children in that they are choosing how they will use their body and be at peace with the fact that they have the choice to use it without force from anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  5. THIS COMMENT IS FROM OCTAVIA: I agree with your analysis and it is the classic example of using the system to beat the system. This is a good way to look at feminism through a lense that is unlike the classic feminism where it rejects including or depending on men of some sort. The women in A Project Chick use the resources and strategies that they have available to create agency for themselves in an environement where they are subject to racial and gender oppression and poverty. I like that you acknowledge their strength, and recognize that characters like Gypsy and Tressa finds a sort of empowerment in using their bodies to provide for themselves and their children in that they are choosing how they will use their body and be at peace with the fact that they have the choice to use it without force from anyone else.

    ReplyDelete